Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-05-09 13:37:37
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1598 $1598
SAVE $click

$1397 $997
SAVE $400

$2997 $2997
SAVE $click

$230 $230
SAVE $click

$3399 $2899
SAVE $500

$3997 $3497
SAVE $500

$1797 $1397
SAVE $400

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$1999 $1449
SAVE $550

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$500 $440
SAVE $60

$2499 $2499
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

Adobe Camera Raw White Balance and Tint with Ricoh GR (and maybe other brands?)

I was a little puzzled with the odd white balance with the Ricoh GR. I was using 7.4 on my production machine and 8.1 on my laptop.

For the same DNG raw file from the Ricoh GR, observe the huge difference in the As Shot white balance: the Embedded profile reads 4100°K +8M and the Adobe Standard profile reads 5650°K +12G. That’s not a subtle difference, so which setting is used is critical.

Adobe Camera Raw 7.4 (137) vs 8.1 (43) white balance and tint for the same file

It turns out that the difference is related to the choice of camera profile in ACR 8.1 (43) beta; version 7.4 has no such choice.

Camera profile selection in Adobe Camera Raw 8.1 (43)

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.