Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-05-09 22:07:34
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1598 $1598
SAVE $click

$1397 $997
SAVE $400

$2997 $2997
SAVE $click

$230 $230
SAVE $click

$3399 $2899
SAVE $500

$3997 $3497
SAVE $500

$1797 $1397
SAVE $400

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$1999 $1449
SAVE $550

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$500 $440
SAVE $60

$2499 $2499
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Artifacting Example

This issue is present via ACR, SilkyPix and JPEG. SilkyPix and JPEG produce such impaire sharpness that that the evidence is less obvious, but it is still there.

See yesterday’s discussion of the Fujifilm X-E1 artifacting issue, which is identical to the Fujifilm X-Pro1.

Just published in my Guide to Mirrorless is an Fuji X-Pro1 artifacting example that I shot previously with the Fujifilm X-Pro1 back in September, shown below. The example shows several very large actual pixels crops, as well as the original image at large size. Processed using Adobe Camera RAW.

Yosemite Pines
Fujifilm X-Pro1 + Leica 135mm f/3.4 APO-Telyt-M @ f/5.6

A small actual pixels crop from the above:

Actual pixels from Fuji X-Pro1

diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.