Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-05-10 04:14:51
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1598 $1598
SAVE $click

$1397 $997
SAVE $400

$2997 $2997
SAVE $click

$230 $230
SAVE $click

$3399 $2899
SAVE $500

$3997 $3497
SAVE $500

$1797 $1397
SAVE $400

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$1999 $1449
SAVE $550

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$500 $440
SAVE $60

$2499 $2499
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

Leica S 180mm f/3.5 APO-Elmar-S update

I’ve clarified some comments on the Leica 180mm f/3.5 APO-Elmar-S in my August 1 entry— I don’t want anyone to walk away thinking that the 180mm is a bad lens in general just because I had bad luck with one sample.

In particular, it should be clear from my other writing (including Brand-new Blur), that no brand is immune from issues, even Leica— there is always room for a “bad sample”. That said, my fairly extensive experience with Leica “glass” has been almost entirely free of issues, in stark contrast to certain other brands. So I suppose there is a first time for everything (eg Leica).

I do hope to revisit the 180/3.5 APO-Elmar-S when another sample (and S2) can be obtained, because it was clear to me that its potential optical quality is outstanding (setting aside this one sample’s slight asymmetry). In fact, I doubt if a better lens exists in its focal length, though no doubt there are some of similar caliber.


diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.