Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-05-09 15:56:16
Designed for the most demanding needs of photographers and videographers.
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1598 $1598
SAVE $click

$1397 $997
SAVE $400

$2997 $2997
SAVE $click

$230 $230
SAVE $click

$3399 $2899
SAVE $500

$3997 $3497
SAVE $500

$1797 $1397
SAVE $400

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$1999 $1449
SAVE $550

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$500 $440
SAVE $60

$2499 $2499
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

Canon TS-E 17/4L and 24/3.5L II in infrared

Beater
Canon 5D-IR + TS-E 24/3.5L II @ f/11

There aren’t many wide angle lenses that perform well in infrared; nearly all of them have troublesome hot spots or otherwise poor performance.

In fact, according to my tests of 60 or so lenses for the diglloyd Guide to Digital Infrared Photography, there are essentially no conventional wide angles free of issues (a strong hot spot in most cases).

The exception are industrial lenses such as the Zeiss ZF 25/2.8 IR-Distagon, with special coatings, a mainstay for my infrared shooting with my Canon 5D-IR. You generally cannot buy the IR lenses from Zeiss however.

Now along come the new Canon TS-E 17/4L and 24/3.5L II, just recently reviewed in DAP, and I have to say I’m astonished at just how good they are for infrared— head and shoulder above all other wide angles I’ve tried (except for the ZF 25/2.8 IR-Distagon). Canon’s claim of a “specially coated aspherical element” holds more than a little water here, and is a serious breakthrough for infrared shooters. For more infrared examples, see the review.


diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.