Latest or all posts or last 15, 30, 90 or 180 days.
2024-05-09 22:36:20
877-865-7002
Today’s Deal Zone Items... Handpicked deals...
$1598 $1598
SAVE $click

$1397 $997
SAVE $400

$2997 $2997
SAVE $click

$230 $230
SAVE $click

$3399 $2899
SAVE $500

$3997 $3497
SAVE $500

$1797 $1397
SAVE $400

$2499 $1999
SAVE $500

$1999 $1449
SAVE $550

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$500 $440
SAVE $60

$2499 $2499
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$999 $849
SAVE $150

$1049 $849
SAVE $200

$680 $680
SAVE $click

$300 $300
SAVE $click

$5999 $4399
SAVE $1600

$4499 $3499
SAVE $1000

$999 $999
SAVE $click

$799 $799
SAVE $click

$1199 $899
SAVE $300

The fastest, toughest, and most compatible portable SSD ever with speeds up to 2800MB/s.

Canon 1D Mark III sub mirror fix

Looks like my Canon EOS 1D Mark III is one of the affected bodies that will need the sub mirror fix. As I have mainly used manual focus with the 1D Mark III (Zeiss ZF lenses), I have not been too bothered, but I have found that the 1DM3 focuses inaccurately with a variety of lenses under conditions that should have resulted in perfect focus (fixed subjects, not ones in motion).

I haven’t done a scientific A/B test to verify that the 1DM3 focus is in fact worse than other cameras, though it seems so. Read my Focus Accuracy article for insights into focusing as a general issue. Not described there (yet) is the fact that recent tests with a dozen Canon EF lenses using the Canon EOS 1Ds Mark II showed not-quite-right focus with fully half the lenses (not wildly off, but enough that a slight manual tweak showed better contrast and slightly better resolution). Still, the 1DM3 does seem worse than any other brand/body I’ve used, but not under all circumstances.

One can complain about Nikon taking a long time to release newer technologies such as full-frame (see Goodbye Nikon?), but in the past few years it seems that Canon bodies have needed more firmware updates, and now an actual hardware modification in a professional caliber body. Was it rushed to market to beat Nikon?

What working pro wants to send in the 1DM3 for service for an unspecified number of days/weeks with no loaner body? (Rent one at $150/day for two weeks?) And given that the serial number range covers 45,000 cameras, the time required and the quality of the repair is certainly a concern. Yes, one expects warranty coverage, but that’s the bare minimum to expect, especially after a four month denial by Canon of any problem. No one buys an EOS 1D Mark III as a casual camera—customers deserve a substantial and tangible acknowledgement of the inconvenience and expense. Doubling the warranty to two years instead of one year would seem appropriate.


diglloyd Inc. | FTC Disclosure | PRIVACY POLICY | Trademarks | Terms of Use
Contact | About Lloyd Chambers | Consulting | Photo Tours
RSS Feeds | X.com/diglloyd
Copyright © 2022 diglloyd Inc, all rights reserved.